Accounting For A License Agreement

In this case, the license is for a symbolic IP. This is because the IP address does not have a standalone feature. that is, the utility dates back to the past and continued the activities of Company L. These activities include the pursuit of a team, the maintenance of the team in the Rochester area, etc. As a result, the license offers a right to IP and the turnover is recognized over time. Company S is a global media company with a well-known brand. Company S recently granted its logo to Customer T to use on children`s hats sold in North America and Europe. The contract contains a provision that gives customer T the right to use the logo in North America and Europe from December 1, 20X1. The SEC urged Starbucks to request that “management`s judgments regarding the determination of pre-opening services (service obligations 2 and 3 above) differ from the licensing obligation.

IP licensing agreements often contain provisions that explicitly or implicitly define the attributes of a licence (ASC 606-10-55-64). Contracts may, for example, limit the IP address to a geography and/or a certain time. Provisions defining the attributes of a license are not taken into account in determining whether an IP license offers a right to use or a right of access to the IP. However, in some cases, explicit or implied provisions may result in commitments to transfer additional licences. In these cases, entities must separately evaluate each licence to determine their nature. For licensees: Find out as much as possible about your licensees. Through due diligence, licensees can learn how the licensee works. It is important to ensure that the licensee`s management/accounting systems/controls are structured so that he or she can comply with the financial provisions of your license.

To illustrate this point, continue to consider Scenario 3 in the example above. Since the levy was considered to be primarily related to the licensing of a patent, it cannot be subdivided into elements subject to the royalty directive and a party subject to the considerations of standard variables. Therefore, the amount of royalties allocated to engineering services can only be recognized after the subsequent transfer of engineering services or the solution of uncertainty as to the amount of royalties to be received. If the customer sells products that use the patent, which allows the company to pay for the royalty, the revenue would be accounted for and distributed between the license and engineering services. Part of the basic approach of the new guidelines is that revenue should be recognized to represent the transfer of a promised service or service. The application of the concept of transfer to licences, as well as several other unique aspects of licensing, required specific advice for revenue recognition. For example, the evidence of the transfer of a service is that the customer can dictate how goods or services are used; However, intellectual property licenses may contractually prevent the customer from dictating the use of licensed intellectual property. Because intellectual property can be copied unlimitedly, the client may not be able to use the majority of the benefits of the asset or prevent others from obtaining asset benefits in the same way as for a traditional service.

While the Stage 2 guide for licensing is the same as for other goods and services, there are some challenges that entities that enter into licensing agreements can face.

Comments are closed.